Going it Mostly Alone: the Publishing Path of A Perfect Blindness

Mind Changed: Self-publishing Part 4: intake to the alternate Publishing Path cont’ further

Hours passed as I waited for word I had to find a different publisher over explicit writing.

An email finally arrive: She explained that the restriction refers ONLY to underage characters, and so long as the characters are adults NC-17 is fine.

That resolved, they moved forward with the content edit and I returned to waiting: This time for almost three weeks.

Then I got an unwelcome surprise: I’d violated that same provision in two places.

No. That’s impossible. Everyone in the book is over eighteen.

The violation notice came with about a page and a half of text from two scenes with the offending details highlighted. I read the yellow highlighted spots as well as the exact provision it violated: “too much detail when at least one of the characters is underage.”

But these scenes didn’t “actually” happen: Both scenes involve a lie being told to a character, inside the story. In the first instance, one character lies about her age to see how the other character would react; in the second instance, one character tries to make another jealous by lying about a tryst with “younger” woman—of no specific age—at a party. In other words, the first time a character lies about her age; in the second a character lies about something that never happened. It seemed so obvious: these are both lies; no underage anything happened.

That though got me to think: This is a novel; none of this actually happened. So in a work of fiction, what is the difference between giving an explicit description of a fake sex scene and giving an explicit description of a real one? Whatever that could possibly mean in a world where everything’s fabrication. To the content evaluators, none. To a postmodernist PhD candidate, questions about the meaning of relative truths between storytelling levels could make a fine, subtle doctorial dissertation.

For me though, I had a simple choice: stick to my artistic guns and refuse to remove the subterfuge and find another publisher, or revise a couple of sentences.

I revised. The first instance, when the character lies about being 17, only required moving the clause that “she turned 19 on her next birthday six weeks later” up a couple of lines. In the second instance I simply cut out the explicit parts: Jealousy doesn’t need a graphic details. Yet after I removed them, I realized I’d missed an opportunity of raise the stakes in the scene. So, I reworked it again for another level of jeopardy by playing on the audience knowing something one of the characters didn’t. So in spite of my grumbling that this was only a lie in the first place, I was able to make the scene stronger.

That second crisis resolved, I sent the revised manuscript back, and started waiting for the okay from the content evaluator, which came quite quickly.

Because the book was on a track toward the Traditional Publishing Path, it now had a second hurdle to cross: the editorial evaluation to see if the book had any real potential.

I'd love to hear what you're thinking right now. Let me know.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.